jgorm
data junkie
Intermediate Wheeler, expect Minor Body Damage

Offline
Posts: 79
|
 |
« on: July 27, 2010, 08:45:10 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
jgorm
data junkie
Intermediate Wheeler, expect Minor Body Damage

Offline
Posts: 79
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2010, 09:15:26 AM » |
|
Thanks. The turnbuckles are from marshalls hardware. I forget the rating for them, but it was pretty high. The hitch is not "designed" to use them, they are my additional mod. The truck hitch is a class 5 2.5". I want to run brakes in the jeep just to be extra safe in a panic stop. The rig is a heavy beast and i've locked up the fronts on a panic stop before. I have thought about getting an adjustable rear bias control to allow the rear brakes to do more work. With 4000lb in the bed i would assume that the 4 rear wheels will have equal or greater braking force compared to the fronts. Those drums are freakin huge! I think they weigh 75lb each. I think the brake shoes are 4x6". .jpg)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
99xj
M.O.M. Awarded
Factory Sponsored Pro-Crawler, expect Catastrophic Body Damage
   
Offline
Posts: 513
Don't talk about it...Let's go wheeling!
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2010, 07:28:49 PM » |
|
I have a motorcycle carrier /tow bar extention that is 45" and it works great. I used heavy chain to secure it to the motorhome, the turn buckles should be fine. In California any vehicle 1500 pounds or more requires a seperate brake system. I have been pulled over and inspected for a "Brake Buddy" by the CHP. I have a Blue Ox, but there are other brands, Brake Buddy. http://www.brakebuddy.com/Towing-Laws
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
99 Cherokee, Rubicon Express bastard Lift , 2.2 DT Remote Reservoir Shocks, HP-D30, alloys, 8.8 and a bunch of other stuff!
|
|
|
|
jbolty
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2010, 09:15:02 PM » |
|
Not true. Vehicles towed with a tow bar and all 4 on the ground are not required to have trailer brakes in CA. Found the relevant part of the code section. CA Vehicle Code 26458. (a) The braking system on every motor vehicle used to tow another vehicle shall be so arranged that one control on the towing vehicle shall, when applied, operate all the service brakes on the power unit and combination of vehicles when either or both of the following conditions exist: (1) The towing vehicle is required to be equipped with power brakes. (2) The towed vehicle is required to be equipped with brakes and is equipped with power brakes. (b) Subdivision (a) shall not be construed to prohibit motor vehicles from being equipped with an additional control to be used to operate the brakes on the trailer or trailers. (c) Subdivision (a) does not apply to any of the following combinations of vehicles, if the combination of vehicles meets the stopping distance requirements of Section 26454: (1) Vehicles engaged in driveaway-towaway operations. (2) Disabled vehicles, while being towed. (3) Towed motor vehicles. (4) Trailers equipped with inertially controlled brakes which are designed to be applied automatically upon breakaway from the towing vehicle and which are capable of stopping and holding the trailer stationary for not less than 15 minutes. Here is the part about stopping distance. CA Vehicle Code 26454. (a) The service brakes of every motor vehicle or combination of vehicles shall be adequate to control the movement of and to stop and hold such vehicle or combination of vehicles under all conditions of loading on any grade on which it is operated. (b) Every motor vehicle or combination of vehicles, at any time and under all conditions of loading, shall, upon application of the service brake, be capable of stopping from an initial speed of 20 miles per hour according to the following requirements:
Maximum Stopping Distance (feet) (1) Any passenger vehicle... 25 (2) Any single motor vehicle with a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of less than 10,000 lbs... 40 (3) Any combination of vehicles consisting of a passenger vehicle or any motor vehicle with a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of less than 10,000 lbs. in combination with any trailer, semitrailer or trailercoach... 40
(4) Any single motor vehicle with a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 lbs. or more or any bus... 40 (5) All other combinations of vehicles... 50
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 30, 2010, 07:46:48 AM by jbolty »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jgorm
data junkie
Intermediate Wheeler, expect Minor Body Damage

Offline
Posts: 79
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2010, 07:48:24 AM » |
|
Thanks guys! I think it would be unsafe to flat tow anything behind my rig without brakes. If CA laws say that you need brakes for any trailer over 1500lbs i would think that towing a 4000lb jeep with no brakes might be a bad idea, even if it is not against the law. (Normally I tend to be the "stupid laws will not be followed" type of person). I would have no issue flat towing the jeep behind a giant class A DP with no brakes. My truck weighs about 6800lbs unloaded, so probably a bit over 10K loaded with the camper and gear. I'm slightly pushing the limit already.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
90_4Runner
Amateur Wheeler, expect no Body Damage
Offline
Posts: 27
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2010, 11:29:38 AM » |
|
I would definitely get all of the stopping power I could. With my F-450 hauling my cabover and towing the 4Runner on the trailer, my brakes became very hot going down the hills in Big Bear. About half way down I fixed the trailer brake controller and everything was good after that. The more stopping power the better.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mikegyver1
Forum Moderator
Factory Sponsored Pro-Crawler, expect Catastrophic Body Damage
   
Offline
Posts: 2594
760 Ramona, CA
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2010, 04:17:32 PM » |
|
X2 what the use of having all the power on tap if you can't stop the darn thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
What's on the other side? Maybe we should look first. (Na' it will give us something talk about later) Mike
|
|
|
84sr5
Intermediate Wheeler, expect Minor Body Damage

Offline
Posts: 93
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: September 30, 2010, 05:24:49 PM » |
|
Have you thought of having a longer towbar for the jeep insted of having such a extened reciver off the truck?Just thinking of sideloading/twisting. And as far as the brakes ,the more power the shorter the stopping distance.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jgorm
data junkie
Intermediate Wheeler, expect Minor Body Damage

Offline
Posts: 79
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: October 01, 2010, 07:44:59 AM » |
|
I would definitely get all of the stopping power I could. With my F-450 hauling my cabover and towing the 4Runner on the trailer, my brakes became very hot going down the hills in Big Bear. About half way down I fixed the trailer brake controller and everything was good after that. The more stopping power the better.
Even with downshifting? I hardly use the brakes on steep hills. Have you thought of having a longer towbar for the jeep insted of having such a extened reciver off the truck?Just thinking of sideloading/twisting. And as far as the brakes ,the more power the shorter the stopping distance.
No, there would be stuff in the way. I don't think that would be a better option. The bar is pretty strong, rated for 500lb /5000lb, even at that length. The hitch itself is class 5 1000/10,000. Those turnbuckles are my addition to help with any potential side loading, but the side loading should be minimal when flat towing ( i would think).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mikegyver1
Forum Moderator
Factory Sponsored Pro-Crawler, expect Catastrophic Body Damage
   
Offline
Posts: 2594
760 Ramona, CA
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: October 01, 2010, 08:27:40 AM » |
|
What are the pictures showing us in the beginning of your post?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
What's on the other side? Maybe we should look first. (Na' it will give us something talk about later) Mike
|
|
|
jgorm
data junkie
Intermediate Wheeler, expect Minor Body Damage

Offline
Posts: 79
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: October 01, 2010, 09:04:12 AM » |
|
Just the air bag system and camper tie down. The air bags helped a ton with keeping the front tires planted. The other pictures are of the hitch extension needed to clear the bumper on the camper.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
90_4Runner
Amateur Wheeler, expect no Body Damage
Offline
Posts: 27
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: October 06, 2010, 02:52:19 PM » |
|
Even with downshifting? I hardly use the brakes on steep hills.
No, there would be stuff in the way. I don't think that would be a better option. The bar is pretty strong, rated for 500lb /5000lb, even at that length. The hitch itself is class 5 1000/10,000. Those turnbuckles are my addition to help with any potential side loading, but the side loading should be minimal when flat towing ( i would think).
Yes, even with down shifting people still pullout in front of you or do stupid things where you need to stop quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chad reed
M.O.M. Awarded
Privateer Pro Crawler, expect Extensive Body Damage
   
Online
Posts: 471
87 zuk
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: November 04, 2010, 07:51:14 PM » |
|
i have a hitch like that but it has 2 receivers and 2 bars to the hitch .im pulling 2 qauds and a samurai ona flat bed .i also have a jake brake on the truck that works great .the lsat pick is what i use to tow
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1987 samurai ,streched to 102 ,spidertrax d44 axle,full floaters ,arb's,1.6 motor,6.5 t-case ,5:13 r&p ,prp seats ,full cage
|
|
|
|